Empowering Shared Decision-Making in Medical Education: The B.R.A.I.N. Framework for doctor-patient consultations

Two stylized human head silhouettes facing each other, one black and one yellow. Each head contains a brain shape made from tangled string—white string in the black head and multicolored string in the yellow head—symbolizing contrasting thought processes or perspectives. The background is a textured teal surface.

Shared decision making (SDM) is a cornerstone of patient-centred care, a key focus in NHS policy, GMC guidance, and NICE recommendations. Yet, despite its importance, many clinicians and medical students find shared decision making challenging to implement in real-world consultations. At Norwich Medical School, we’ve responded to this challenge by introducing the B.R.A.I.N. framework—a practical, memorable tool to support shared decision making conversations and help future doctors deliver truly universal personalised care

Why Focus on Shared Decision-Making?

The principle of “No decision about me, without me” is now embedded in UK healthcare, reflecting a shift towards partnership between patients and clinicians. The NHS Long Term Plan and NICE guidelines both emphasise the need for patients to be informed and actively involved in decisions about their care. With the GMC stating that shared decision making should take place with ‘all patients, in all settings, for all decisions—from routine to complex, except where the patient lacks capacity or in emergencies’. However, barriers remain: 

  • Lack of clear tools and resources for structuring SDM conversations 
  • Uncertainty about how to discuss risks, benefits, and alternatives
  • Institutional pressures, time constraints, and complex terminology 
  • Students reporting lower confidence and performance in SDM skills compared to other consultation skills 

Our own student feedback echoed these challenges, with many requesting more guidance and structure for SDM, especially when moving from information-giving to a more collaborative approach. 

Introducing the B.R.A.I.N. Framework

To address these needs, we introduced the B.R.A.I.N mnemonic, adapted from the Choosing Wisely UK campaign and childbirth education resources, and tailored specifically for undergraduate medical education. Unlike a traditional decision aid, this tool is designed for clinicians to use directly during doctor-patient consultations. B.R.A.I.N stands for; Benefits, Risks, Alternatives, Intuition, (do) Nothing. 

“Infographic of the BRAIN Framework for treatment decision-making. It includes five sections: Benefits, Risks, Alternatives, Intuition, and Nothing. Each section has guiding questions. Benefits: ‘What are the benefits for the patient?’ and ‘How will this treatment help their symptoms?’ Risks: ‘What are the risks of treatment?’ ‘How might the treatment affect the person’s life?’ and ‘What risks are we trying to prevent?’ Alternatives: ‘What are other treatment options?’ and ‘What treatment is typically used first?’ Intuition: ‘How does the person feel about these options?’ ‘What is important to them in making this decision?’ and ‘Based on what the person has told you, is there an option that appears better suited to them?’ Nothing: ‘What would watchful waiting look like?’ ‘What will happen if the person decides to do nothing?’ and ‘What risks are we trying to avoid?’”

Figure 1. B.R.A.I.N a framework for doctors to help facilitate shared decision making conversations. 

This framework helps medical students and clinicians move beyond simply listing treatment options. Instead, it encourages them to focus on what truly matters to each individual patient. The B.R.A.I.N framework is designed to support clinicians in explaining treatment and care plans in a way that fosters genuine collaboration and partnership. By using this approach, both clinician and patient work together to build a shared understanding and make decisions about care as a team. 

Integrating B.R.A.I.N. with the Calgary-Cambridge Guide we embedded B.R.A.I.N. within the established Calgary-Cambridge consultation model, ensuring that SDM is not a standalone skill but integrated throughout the consultation. Students are encouraged to: 

  • Set the agenda and invite the patient to participate in decision making 
  • Gather the patient’s perspective using ICE (Ideas, Concerns, Expectations) 
  • Clearly explain the details of the condition and all available options 
  • Use B.R.A.I.N. to structure the discussion, check understanding, and explore patient preferences 
  • Build rapport by actively listening, picking up on cues, and showing empathy 
“Infographic showing a structured consultation framework combining the BRAIN shared decision-making model with communication skills. The center column outlines the consultation stages: initiating a shared decision-making conversation, gathering information, providing explanation, planning using the BRAIN acronym (Benefits, Risks, Alternatives, Intuition, Nothing), and closing the session. On the left, a vertical banner labeled ‘Providing Structure’ lists skills: logical sequence, sign-posting, summarising, sharing your thinking, and screening. On the right, a vertical banner labeled ‘Building the relationship’ lists skills: actively listening, understanding the patient’s narrative, exploring biopsychosocial factors, picking up cues, and showing sensitivity and empathy.”

Figure 2. B.R.A.I.N integrated with the Calgary Cambridge Guide, demonstrating the key skills needed for successful shared decision making conversation.  

This approach helps medical students develop a logical, patient-centred sequence for consultations, while also supporting the development of communication skills that are essential for safe and effective practice. 

Early Impact and Evaluation

Since introducing B.R.A.I.N., we have trained over 600 third-year undergraduate medical students, with positive feedback from students, simulated patients, and tutors alike. Students report greater confidence in structuring SDM conversations, and our student evaluation data suggests significantly improved satisfaction with their teaching and practice compared to previous models used. We are currently evaluating the impact of B.R.A.I.N using a mixed-methods, pre/ post-intervention design including student evaluations, simulated patient and tutor surveys with collaborators Dr Susan Miles & Dr Sadie Lawes-Wickwar – watch this space for publication!

Looking Ahead

The B.R.A.I.N. framework is already making a difference at Norwich Medical School, supporting a new generation of clinicians to have more meaningful, collaborative conversations with patients. By empowering medical students to explore not just the clinical facts, but also the patient’s values, preferences, and intuition, we are helping to deliver truly personalised care. 

We believe that sharing practical tools like B.R.A.I.N can help bridge the gap between policy and practice, and we would welcome collaboration with colleagues across the UK and beyond to integrate this approach for better patient outcomes.  

Interested in learning more or collaborating? 
Contact Dr Ellen Lowry at e.lowry@uea.ac.uk. 

Conference presentation slides [downloads PowerPoint file]

Written by:

Ellen Lowry is a Chartered Psychologist and Behavioural Scientist working at the intersection of cognitive neuroscience, medical education, and clinical communication. She applies rigorous experimental principles to design and evaluate innovative educational interventions that enhance patient experience and support clinician development. Her translational research bridges the gap between theory and practice, focusing on behavioural change, health promotion, Shared Decision Making, and person-centred communication to strengthen patient interactions and improve health outcomes.

Share this blog post:

false

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.